RECOMMENDATION Time Identification Written on 28th January 2026

This is dedicated to the KING of Kings and the LORD of Lords.

@WhiteHouse
@delcyrodriguezv
@Canada
@POTUS
@ONUVENuevaYork
@CanadianPM 
@Stanford
@MIT
@texasgov
@PMEthiopia
@tcdglobal
@tcddublin
@JapanGov
@JPN_PMO
@RMIT
@electmonitorng
@SkiesMonitor
@AbiodunAAjijola

Written and conceptualised by Abiodun Mohammed Adeyemi Ajijola 

RECOMMENDATION

Time Identification

Written on 28th January 2026 

The purpose of this recommendation is to recommend leveraging time as a basis for identification.

The first aspect is a base identification for each human being or person participating in this or in a jurisdiction where time identification is used.

First is the date of birth. This is a common feature of identification numbers.

Second is the time of birth. This is the exact time of birth. It is clear that some people do not have this information but may have the day of birth. For such people, a time can be generated for them if they know the part of the day, whether morning, afternoon or night that they were born. However, if they don't have any part of the day, then a time can be generated within that day that is unique to only that person.

Therefore, the basis of Time Identification is the date of birth and the time of birth.

The foundation of this recommendation is that all human activity can be differentiated by time depending on the extent of the accuracy of the timing. For instance, in a sprint race, to the biological eyes it may appear that two or more people cannot be distinguished. However, when the time at which each person presses or touches the finish line is examined, it may be discovered that the time each touched the finish line is not the same. This may require distinguishing up to the microsecond or even a higher accuracy, but it can be determined that there is a difference between the time each person touches the finish line. This shows that even in such tight circumstances, people can be differentiated by time.

Another instance of differentiating by time is clocking in to work, for instance. In some organisations, people fill in a time sheet when they come to work. This means that in theory, it is possible to identify a person by the time that the person signed the time sheet, as long as they are unique timings. If the timing can be differentiated up to microseconds or perhaps nanoseconds or even picoseconds or even more, it stands to reason that each person can have a unique time.

What is the purpose?

The purpose of this is to better uniquely identify people with different specific activities with a benchmark of time. For instance, if a person boards a flight at a particular time, it is feasible to compare the boarding time with the time identification. This requires that the boarding time would be able to provide timings perhaps upto microseconds or more. This would distinguish each passenger not only by name but by boarding time. Therefore, there is a difference between the boarding time of the passenger and the time identification of the passenger, which is the date of birth and the time of birth. This figure helps to provide a further level of unique identification of the passenger. The three levels are as seen here:

i. Time Identification (date of birth and time of birth)

ii. Boarding time of the passenger for the flight

iii. Difference in time from points one and two above.

These three unique numbers provide a unique identification of each passenger. The likelihood that the three numbers would match for any passenger is impossible because the time identification cannot match. In addition, the boarding time for that flight to microseconds or nanoseconds, if necessary, can also not match. It is feasible that the difference between the figures from point one and two could match for more than one passenger. While this is highly unlikely, it is in the realm of possibility. However, the three numbers together make for a unique identification of that passenger as distinct not only from any other passenger on that flight but any other passenger in the world.

Why is this advantageous?

In my opinion, using time to identify people in addition to biometrics makes impersonation much less feasible and perhaps non-existent.

Another advantage of this is that any electronic transaction of any nature can also leverage time identification to increase the integrity of the transactions and protect the uniqueness of each person.

The time identification also better helps in mapping missing persons or legally tracking criminals. This is because each transaction records the unique timing and no less than the three figures mentioned above. The last known transaction a person made can be used to help trace the circumference of where the person could be considering the time it is known that the person is missing and the time of the last transaction and prior transactions. In the same manner, criminals can be tracked from when it is known that they committed a crime and the last time they made a transaction.

In order to increase the uniqueness of the identity of a person, an additional but optional feature could be included depending on the nation or sector of usage. Some sectors, such as the financial sector, require much more transparency and robustness than other sectors.

This feature is the ability to record every time the time identification is used. That is where a transaction is made. This means that the system which enables the operation of the time identification is a system that takes note of the time of each transaction. This means that there are a whole new set of numbers uniquely assigned to the particular user which are not assigned to any other person. This is because if transactions are able to record up to microseconds, it is unlikely that any two transactions can have the same transaction time. This has been explained earlier. Therefore, there is a pool of transaction times which uniquely identify an individual that is assigned to that time identification. An additional option is to also determine the difference between these transaction times and the time identification number. This, as stated earlier, creates yet another unique pool of numbers unique to a single person having a single time identification. These pools of numbers become more unique as the person makes more transactions. Overtime, it is practically impossible for one time identification number to have any real semblance to another time identification number. This can be done electronically with a system that updates on every transaction.

With this level of integrity, the focus also needs to be on ensuring that a person's biometrics cannot be swapped with another person to get that person's time identification. This is not naturally feasible since the person has a different birthdate and time of birth as well as fingerprints and other biometrics. However, in the situation of an attempted impersonation with internal connivance, it could be precarious. Therefore, to circumvent this entirely, people who have time identification would have to go online or into the office of the organisation legally operating the programme and revalidate their biometrics. This could perhaps be once a year or less.

Another option is that if a user of a time identification suspects that someone else may be using the same time identification, the person can make the request online to the company in charge and then the company may require the person to provide 5 or more recent transaction times inclusive of dates which that person may know and then input them which enables the system to confirm that the person is still the right person with the time identification. This is just one way to do that, but certainly it would be quite feasible to keep time identifications consistently and completely secured. For instance, this can even be used for over-the-counter confirmation of time identification in a financial institution if the institution suspects the person is not the true custodian of the specific time identification.

This is recommended to the Federal Government of the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America.

This is recommended to Venezuela, with the capital in Caracas, South America. 

This is also recommended to Canada with capital in Ottawa, North America. 

To help facilitate this, the following institutions and locations are also recommended.

1. Stanford University, The State of California, The United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America.

2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, The United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America.

The State of Texas, The United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America.

This is also recommended to the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia with capital in Addis Ababa on the Continent of Africa.

Trinity College Dublin (TCD), the Republic of Ireland with its capital in Dublin on the Continent of Europe.

This is also recommended to Japan with its capital in Tokyo on the Continent of Asia. 

This is also recommended to The Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University) located in the city of Melbourne in Victoria, Australia.

The nations, locations and or organisations recommended may choose to cooperate to develop this or seek to legally achieve this individually. 

Me who write this physically may still make this recommendation to another nation or institution or more.